How Does Dyslexia Affect Social Skills?

Young adults sitting together and talking on outdoor steps.

Pexels image by Tima Miroshnichenko

 

Dyslexia does not automatically affect someone’s social skills. Many dyslexic people are thoughtful communicators, highly sociable and strong at building relationships.

However, repeated experiences of struggling with reading, spelling, verbal instructions or fast-paced communication can affect confidence and participation. For some people, especially where dyslexia sits alongside ADHD, autism, dyspraxia or auditory-processing differences, social situations may require more energy than others realise.

How Does Dyslexia Affect Social Skills?

Dyslexia is primarily a learning difference that affects reading, spelling and written-language processing. It does not mean someone cannot understand people, communicate well or have meaningful friendships.[1]

However, the effort involved in processing information, remembering details, responding quickly or managing repeated misunderstandings can affect how comfortable someone feels in conversations, classrooms and workplaces.

Having Low Self-Esteem

For some people, the social impact of dyslexia is less about social ability and more about the confidence that has been shaped by difficult experiences.

At school, I did not like reading aloud. I was often told that I read too quickly, while spelling felt almost impossible to hold onto. I could spend hours trying to learn words for a spelling test, only to forget them when it mattered. Even relatively common words, such as “behave”, could feel difficult to retain despite repeated study.

The result was often being below the expected level, despite the effort I had put in. When instructions were given, I did not always understand or follow them in the way teachers expected. The feedback was often that I needed to pay more attention.

At the time, my dyslexia was undiagnosed, as were my autism, ADHD and dyspraxia. That wider picture matters. I had one close friend and a number of acquaintances, but I did not feel particularly comfortable with classmates or teachers.

Dyslexia does not automatically lead to low self-esteem. But environments that repeatedly focus on speed, spelling, mistakes or compliance can create shame. Accessible teaching and strengths-based feedback can change that experience.

Struggling to Hold a Conversation

Dyslexia does not prevent someone from holding a conversation. Many dyslexic people are excellent verbal communicators.

However, some people may need more time to organise what they mean, process what has been said or hold several points in working memory at once. Fast conversations, interruptions or group discussions can make it harder to contribute.

For me, I can lose my thread in conversation, particularly if I am interrupted. When I have the space to finish a thought, I can communicate clearly. But I have had to work hard to develop that skill.

I attended public-speaking classes for years to learn how to organise my thoughts in a structured way and communicate persuasively. It was not something that came naturally to me.

When several people are speaking, I can find it difficult to know when to interject. If the discussion moves on before I have found a way into the conversation, I may decide not to add my point at all.

This can be misread as a lack of confidence, interest or knowledge. In reality, someone may be listening carefully, processing the discussion and deciding how best to contribute.

Difficulty Reading Social Cues

Difficulty reading social cues is not a defining feature of dyslexia.

Where someone finds facial expressions, implied meaning, tone of voice, group dynamics or unspoken rules difficult, this may relate to co-occurring neurodivergence, anxiety, sensory overload, language-processing differences or past experiences of being misunderstood.

Neurotypes do not always exist in isolation. Someone may be dyslexic and autistic, dyslexic and ADHD, or dyslexic and dyspraxic. Their social experiences may be shaped by the interaction of those differences rather than dyslexia alone.

For example, sarcasm can be a complicated area. I have often used sarcasm and can be quick-witted, but over time I have learned to read the room more carefully. Sarcasm does not land well in every environment, and workplace culture can influence what is considered acceptable or safe to say.

Rather than assuming a dyslexic person has missed a social cue, it is more useful to communicate clearly and check understanding. Curiosity is more helpful than making assumptions about what someone has or has not understood.

Pexels image by Soumya Ranjan

Remembering Things Incorrectly

Some dyslexic people experience working-memory differences. This can make it harder to retain several pieces of information at once, particularly in busy, fast-moving or stressful situations.[2]

Socially, this might look like forgetting names, losing track of part of a conversation, mixing up dates or remembering the sequence of events differently. It does not mean someone does not care or was not listening.

In my own experience, I have sometimes misread an email and responded to the clearest part of the request, often near the end, while missing other instructions that were more ambiguous or implied.

That does not mean the information was not there. It means the way it was structured required me to decode what the real ask was.

I now record important conversations where appropriate because details often contain the nuance that needs to be explored. I do not assume someone will follow up after a meeting with all the relevant information, actions or context, so I tend to create that clarity myself.

Written follow-ups, clear action points, shared notes and permission to ask clarifying questions can reduce unnecessary misunderstandings.

Finding It Difficult to Understand Jokes

Dyslexia does not automatically make jokes difficult to understand.

However, some people may find puns, sarcasm, fast verbal humour or jokes that depend on quick language processing more difficult in the moment. They may understand the joke later, once they have had time to process the wording or context.

This can also overlap with autism, auditory-processing differences, anxiety or simply having a different humour style.

Humour often relies on speed, timing, shared context and assumptions about what someone has heard or understood. Not everyone processes those things at the same pace.

Taking longer to understand a joke does not mean someone lacks intelligence, personality or social awareness. It may simply mean that the language, timing or context needed more processing time.

The same applies more broadly to informal social communication. People may assume everyone understands shorthand, implied requests or workplace banter in the same way. Clearer communication benefits everyone, not only neurodivergent people.

Dyslexia and Social Communication at Work

Dyslexia does not mean someone cannot communicate effectively, contribute ideas or build strong working relationships.

However, many workplaces are built around speed: fast meetings, verbal-only instructions, informal conversations, quick responses and the assumption that everyone understands an ask in the same way.

For some dyslexic people, particularly where dyslexia sits alongside ADHD, dyspraxia, autism or auditory-processing differences, this can create unnecessary friction.

For me, verbal instructions can become difficult when people move quickly or assume context has already been shared. I may hear the main point but miss a detail, an implied expectation, a file someone assumed I had seen or the specific outcome they are expecting.

That does not mean I am disengaged. It means I may need time to clarify the ask, process what has been said and make sure there is shared understanding before responding.

In meetings, I can find it difficult to contribute when several people are talking or when I am interrupted. If I am shut down while making a point, I may pause and return to it later in writing, where I can communicate more clearly.

This is also shaped by intersectionality. As a Black woman, taking up space, asking clarifying questions or trying to complete a point has sometimes been interpreted through stereotypes, including being described as “aggressive”. That language can be particularly harmful because it discourages people from contributing and reinforces the idea that clarity, challenge or direct communication is a problem.

Engagement is often measured through a narrow, neurotypical lens: who speaks first, who responds fastest, whose camera is on or who contributes most frequently.

But engagement can also look like listening, processing, asking thoughtful questions, clarifying ambiguity and returning with a considered contribution.

 

Pexels Image by Pavel Danilyuk

 

What Helps Dyslexic Employees Communicate at Work

Workplace situation What can create friction What helps
Meetings with vague agendas Being invited without knowing the purpose, expected outcome or where your input is needed Send agendas in advance with the purpose, expected decision or action, and who needs to contribute
Fast verbal discussion Multiple people speaking, interruptions or moving on before someone has processed their point Allow pauses, avoid interrupting, invite written follow-up and share recordings or transcripts where appropriate
Verbal-only instructions Missing details, context, implied expectations or files Provide written actions, links, owners and deadlines
Ambiguous requests Having to decode what is being asked or fill in hidden gaps State the outcome, context, available information, owner and deadline clearly
Meetings without actions or decisions Uncertainty about what happens next and who is responsible Clarify whether the meeting is for discussion, action, decision-making or updates, then record next steps
Communication judged by speed Quiet processing being mistaken for disengagement or lack of confidence Measure engagement through contribution quality, follow-through and thoughtful questions, not just who speaks most

A clear agenda is not simply meeting administration. It can be an access tool.

It helps people understand why they are there, what they are expected to contribute and whether the meeting is for discussion, decisions, actions or updates. It also reduces the pressure to infer hidden expectations in real time.

Captions, transcripts, written follow-ups and clear ownership can also be useful. I use subtitles when watching television because auditory processing can mean I occasionally miss a word or misunderstand what was said. In work settings, transcripts and captions offer a way to check understanding, revisit details and ask better follow-up questions.

Employers may also need to consider reasonable adjustments where a worker is placed at a substantial disadvantage because of a disability or health condition.[3]

Dyslexia does not determine whether someone has strong social skills, friendships or workplace relationships.

However, the barriers surrounding dyslexia can affect confidence, participation and how safe someone feels communicating with others. Clear communication, accessible information, thoughtful agendas and room to process can reduce unnecessary pressure.

To learn more about dyslexia, including common traits, strengths and support needs, explore our guide.

You can also try our free dyslexia test. It is not a diagnosis, but it may help you recognise possible traits and decide whether further support would be useful.

Build Better Social and Workplace Conditions

Dyslexia does not determine whether someone can build strong relationships, communicate well or contribute meaningfully at work. But unclear communication, rushed conversations, assumptions about engagement and inaccessible workplace expectations can create unnecessary pressure.

For individuals, support can begin with understanding what helps you process, communicate and contribute in ways that work for you.

Join The EDGE for practical career and workplace support designed to help neurodivergent people turn everyday friction into clearer next steps, without masking, over-explaining or doing it all alone.

For employers, inclusive communication is not just about individual adjustments. It is about creating meetings, feedback, expectations and team practices that allow more people to contribute well.

Explore manager training with Exceptional Individuals to help managers build practical confidence in supporting neurodivergent employees and creating more inclusive ways of working.

Sources and Further Reading

  1. British Dyslexia Association. “What is dyslexia?”

    https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyslexia/about-dyslexia/what-is-dyslexia
  2. NHS. “Dyslexia in adults.”

    https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/dyslexia-in-adults/
  3. NHS. “Dyslexia in children.”

    https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/dyslexia-in-children/
  4. British Dyslexia Association. “Living with a dyslexic partner.”

    https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/advice/adults/living-with-a-dyslexic-partner
  5. GOV.UK. “Reasonable adjustments for workers with disabilities or health conditions.”

    https://www.gov.uk/reasonable-adjustments-for-disabled-workers
  6. ACAS. “Reasonable adjustments at work.”

    https://www.acas.org.uk/reasonable-adjustments

Blog Author

Ruth-Ellen Danquah


Ruth-Ellen is Chief Innovation Officer for Exceptional Individuals, she co-creates strategic neuroinclusive programmes through training, mentoring & coaching.